i just seen the other artists that are under the Atlantic Records and i would really like to see a duet of Toni Braxton with James Blunt i think they do a great match and they can do a successful collaboration for a romantic song or a sad ballad are both in the adult soft music and James Blunt has much media attention last years. i guess Toni has already her music tracks for the album done so it could be for an existing song like she did with Trey Songz for the promotion of the Yesterday song or something extra like a bonus track or maybe for a future soundtrack! About the single and promotion of Toni's Singles i liked a lot the dj paulo and jackinsky vocal mix of Yesterday song and i would like to see more Dance Mixes in the official CD single if there is one and it is not only online download. An acoustic version of the song is always welcome im still listening her acoustic versions of her past songs she did for AOL sessions i think were really cool. Also about the leaked songs after seeing her live web-chat saying that maybe some of them will not be in the final album cut i hope she will add them at least as b-sides in singles or in the album as bonus tracks! is shame songs like Not a Chance, Melt, and The Breakup to not see the light of my music collection and any Toni Braxton's fan music collection at least legally. for the record i think the Not a Chance is the best song of all by far. also speaking for sales promotion etc i would like to say my disappointment when i went to buy the Yesterday track by the official site and wasn't offered a lossless high quality file but only a lossy data compression .mp3 file! sorry guys on there ill give my money and i will not be able to have it in lossless sound quality like if im buying the same cd? i hope they will have a .flac file there for download We all the the fans deserve to have lossless good quality sound music files when we pay $1.29 for a song.
Tags: .Flac, Atlantic, B-Sides, Blunt, Dance, Duets, James, Leaked, Mixes, Promotion, More…Records, Singles, Songs
-
▶ Reply to This